Skip to main content
Check and provide your planning data

BETA This is a new service – your feedback will help us to improve it.

Back to dataset table
East Hampshire District Council

Tree

There is a problem

  • 1000 entries with tree-preservation-order field must match the reference field in the tree preservation order

1182

reference
204-tree-1
name
1182
tree-preservation-order

undefined

204-tpo-1
uprn
address-text
point
POINT (-1.028857 50.867150)
geometry
MULTIPOLYGON (((-1.028814 50.867145,-1.028816 50.867154,-1.028822 50.867161,-1.028831 50.867167,-1.028843 50.867171,-1.028856 50.867173,-1.028870 50.867172,-1.028882 50.867168,-1.028891 50.867162,-1.028897 50.867154,-1.028900 50.867146,-1.028898 50.867138,-1.028892 50.867130,-1.028882 50.867124,-1.028871 50.867120,-1.028858 50.867119,-1.028844 50.867120,-1.028832 50.867124,-1.028823 50.867130,-1.028817 50.867137,-1.028814 50.867145)))
notes
felled-date
entry-date
2026-08-06
start-date
end-date

How to fix this issue

Your data is missing a tree-preservation-order.

The tree guidance explains how to fix the issue:

tree-preservation-order

The reference for the tree preservation order that affects this tree.

Example: TPO1

This diagram shows the relationship between the tree preservation order dataset and the tree dataset. The reference value from your tree preservation order dataset needs to match the tree-preservation-order value in your tree dataset.

How to improve East Hampshire District Council’s data

  1. Fix the errors indicated
  2. Use the check service to make sure the data meets the standard
  3. Publish the updated data on the endpoint URL